Am 12-03-2016 10:50, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Beno?t GARNIER wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Mar 12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[snipp]
>> > An extra benefit of proceeding like this is that when we move to
>> > multi-threading, we won't have to lock for something which will only
>> > have to be initialized twice :-)
>> Wow, I didn't think haproxy would move to multi-threading one day.
>
> Don't be too excited, it will take decades :-)
Well when you stay tuned you well see a multi-threaded haproxy also ;-)
I think this will be a major version change worth ;-).
cheers Aleks
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:45:25AM +0100, Beno?t GARNIER wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Mar 12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[snipp]
>> > An extra benefit of proceeding like this is that when we move to
>> > multi-threading, we won't have to lock for something which will only
>> > have to be initialized twice :-)
>> Wow, I didn't think haproxy would move to multi-threading one day.
>
> Don't be too excited, it will take decades :-)
Well when you stay tuned you well see a multi-threaded haproxy also ;-)
I think this will be a major version change worth ;-).
cheers Aleks